Global warming research has become a very big business throughout the world. Each year billions of dollars are spent studying climate change. The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), now has an annual budget that has reached more than $136 million. The Bush Administration has spent more than thirty billion dollars on federal programs involved in global warming in the last six years. In total, global warming proponents are estimated to have been funded by more than fifty billion dollars during the last decade.

This huge money stream is flowing directly into the pockets of the advocates of man-made global warming. It is a river of money that can only be shut off if it is discovered that man does not cause global warming and that climate change is really out of our control. In effect, the same people that benefit from the huge research funding pool would have to be motivated to shut it off.

The truth is that the business objective of the man-made global warming bandwagon is an increasing flow of scientific research grants and bureaucratic jobs. The worse the man- made global crisis, the better for the global warming business. In addition, the news media loves stories of fear. This makes man-made global warming a big business for television, magazines, and books as well.

Various “experts” on man-made global warming appear regularly on television to remind everyone of the upcoming global climate catastrophe in the next century. Unfortunately, its not in the interest of the media to cast doubt on man-made global warming. It is a very good business for them. The fact is that very little news media coverage is given to research that brings into doubt the so-called scientific man-made global warming consensus.

Therefore, it is not surprising that we have not heard much from the news media on the recent blockbuster report (December 2007) in the prestigious International Journal of Climatology (Royal Meteorological Society), of professors: David H. Douglass (of the University of Rochester), professor John R. Christy (of the University of Alabama), Benjamin D. Pearson and professor S. Fred Singer (of the University of Virginia). In this report the scientists found: “that observed patterns of temperature changes over the last 30 years disagree with what greenhouse models predict and can better be explained by natural factors, such as solar variability”. Their conclusion was that climate change is “unstoppable” and cannot be affected or modified by controlling the emission of greenhouse gases, such as CO2, as is proposed in current legislation.

Dr. S. Fred Singer, said: “The current warming trend is simply part of a natural cycle of climate warming and cooling that has been seen in ice cores, deep-sea sediments, stalagmites, etc., and published in hundreds of papers in peer-reviewed journals. “Our research demonstrates that the ongoing rise of atmospheric CO2 has only a minor influence on climate change. We must conclude, therefore, that attempts to control CO2 emissions are ineffective and pointless – but very costly.”

The news media has also not made us aware that data (2005) from NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide “ice caps” near Mars’ south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row. This means that both the Earth and Mars have been experiencing similar degrees of global warming. Of course, the problem for the man-made global warming crowd is that there are no humans on Mars for them to blame for that planet’s warming.

In a National Geographic story on February 2007, Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of space research at St. Petersburg’s Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the Sun. He reasons that “The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars.”

The man-made global warming industry should remind us of the tulip bulb mania in Holland in 1636. The history books tell us that in 1593 tulips were brought from Turkey and introduced to the Dutch. The novelty of the new flower made it widely sought after. After a time, the tulips contracted a non-fatal virus known as mosaic, which altered them causing different colors to appear on the petals. The color patterns came in a wide variety and increased the popularity of the flower.

The increase in popularity of the tulip led to a rise in its price. Soon everyone began to deal in tulip bulbs. It became a very big business. Eventually things became so crazy that people were selling everything they owned, including their homes and livestock, to buy tulip bulbs. At the time, the consensus expectation was that the tulip bulb would continue to grow in value forever.

In 1636, tulips were listed on the Amsterdam stock exchange which further accommodated the tulip speculators who had become the primary market for tulip bulbs. The price of a tulip bulb at the height of this mania was $76,000. In the next six weeks tulip bulbs would drop in value to less than one dollar.

Today, man-made global warming is similar to the tulip bulb mania in Holland in 1636. It is an issue that has been hyped into a huge business. The absurd consensus in Holland in 1636 was that tulips were so unique that they would continue to increase in value forever. The current global warming crowd wants us to believe that global warming is controllable and man-made. There is no conclusive evidence that global warming is man-made and all contrary evidence is dismissed and ridiculed. We are told that we must act now to save the planet or our world will be lost to a multitude of catastrophic events in the future.

The inconvenient truth of all this is that, like the Holland tulip bulb in 1636, man-made global warming hype has entered the world of the absurd. We may think the price of $76,000 for a tulip bulb in Holland was silly. However, how silly is it when compared to the global warming hype of today? Indeed in the future people will look back with humor on a decade when tens of billions of dollars were spent in an attempt to convince society that the warming of Earth was due to man and not a function of the Sun.

James William Smith has worked in Senior management positions for some of the largest Financial Services firms in the United States for the last twenty five years. He has also provided business consulting support for insurance organizations and start up businesses. He has always been interested in writing and listening to different viewpoints on interesting topics.

Visit his website at http://www.eworldvu.com

Please Note... All links within articles are placed by their author-owners and not by this blog.Products with in those links may or may not be the best in the world.If it sounds too good to be true it could be a scam.Articles are posted for their info,ideas and or entertainment value only.

Powered By WP Footer

To just Define Global Warming as the protracted increase or decrease of global warming temperature in the earths lower atmosphere was not sufficient for the scientific discipline to distinguish the causes and issues in the global warming temperature shift. Modifications in the planets temperature are induced by natural greenhouses gases, and these had to be discovered to define global warming, every one gave unique consequences on the absorbing and escaping of warmth from the lower atmosphere.

To define global warming these natural ingredients were broken into general groupings and estimated the sum to each one that added to global warming; Cloud Cover, Methane CH4 at 7%, Carbon Dioxide CO2 at 20%, Ozone at 7% and Water vapor at 65%. Historical handwritten registers, archeology information and deep ice core study enabled scientist to build this general baseline of the natural chemical elements.

To generally define global warming, it is a normal and slow drift of the warming of the earth lower atmosphere and in point of fact is still a recuperation action from the historical great ice age. In amassing all this information there were random time periods that seemed to be skewed in the warming temperature. Scientist recognized that these notable data variations had to be explained to correctly define global warming; they surmised the data was a consequence of some shape of large natural event that had to occur to have such a large result on the global warming temperature.

NASA was utilizing satellites to study a long-time natural recognized effect to all fishermen named El Nino (warm water currents) and La Nina (cooler water currents), this was finally affiliated to another study on Solar Flare Activity, El Nino came at high Solar Flare Activity and La Nina happened during low activity, this related the 10 year uniform high to low in the warming temperature. A link was shortly made to the abnormal global warming temperature variances by analyzing the “Year with no Summer” that caused large-scale starving throughout Europe in 1816AD, this was caused by the volcanic blast of Tambor that put adequate partials into the atmosphere to obstruct sunlight for decades. When the volcano Krakatau exploded in 1883AD exact record keeping were being kept world-wide and this provided the satisfying data to define global warming fluctuations and the random exceptional divergence that occurred in the data set. Since then numerous past natural events have been related to tops and bottoms of the global warming temperature information set.

Volcanic activity in the early 1100 AD finishing in 1500AD compounded into creating a Mini-Ice-Age in the mid 1600 AD, it took the next three hundred and fifty years for the worldwide temperature to come up to pre-1000AD temperature levels. This natural re-warming of the global temperature was expected to start flattening off in the mid-1900s. In the 1950s Science became worried that the steep gain in warming temperature was not leveling out but carried on the steep angle of increase.

In 1970 all the researchers concurred this sharp increase in global warming temperature was a effect of the additional gases that are being put into the atmosphere by human being activity commencing at the industrial revolution of burning up fossil fuels in the 1700 AD. This added a different class that added to the global warming temperature changes that made up of not of a natural effect, scientists had to re-define global warming once more, adding the component of human being activity. Human being activity since the industrialized revolution added to the natural greenhouse gases an astonishing 149 percent of Methane and still worse 40 percent more of the lethal Carbon Dioxide, the prime worry from these effects is that virtually all of this growth took place from 1900′s to the 1970′s. Included in human being activity was the removing of forests which is the 2nd largest greenhouse gas remover from the atmosphere, the ocean being number one.

As a result of these primary influences the warming temperature has increased 1.32 degs. Fahrenheit exclusively by human being activity and the bulk of this change came in the past 100 years. In this work to define warming all the data suggested a quick change of two degs. within a very short period of time has had a sizable environmental impact, by continuing the current trend the human being activity will increase the global warming temperature by 3 degs. from the years 2000 to 2060. Deep ice core sampling established the Carbon Dioxide levels of present day duplicate the same levels as the tragic event the wiped out the dinosaurs. This very large increase in Carbon Dioxide began to come about in 1940 at the same time of increase in the call for consumer trade goods and services like the creating of electric power.

It became plain by the 1960s global warming temperature modifications would touch us all. Since then numerous supporting studies to the global warming temperature change have been published; the reactions by Administrations and Big Business in the past 40 years has been OUTRAGEOUS and measures to zero twisting the facts and giving the appearance they are doing something. Clean energy sources have been around for a long time and had Authorities taken action to inform and promote these alternate dependable and cost effective natural energy systems the time line could have been prolonged an additional 80 to 100 years before achieving that critical 3 deg. warming period.

This Linkup holds the tale of De Palma and the construction of the N-Machine including a data link to a source to find drawings utilizing engineering of the theory and making techniques employed behind the chronicle of De Palma and the N-machine that now is called Perpetual Motion Magnets.

Please Note... All links within articles are placed by their author-owners and not by this blog.Products with in those links may or may not be the best in the world.If it sounds too good to be true it could be a scam.Articles are posted for their info,ideas and or entertainment value only.

Powered By WP Footer